While I agree that Google should not have released the personal information of this blogger, you can hardly say they failed to protecter her “right to privacy”. You have no right to privacy from a company. You have a right to privacy from the government, not people.

A blogger who called a magazine cover model offensive names on a Web site says Google failed to protect her right to privacy.

Rosemary Port tells the Daily News in Sunday editions that she’s angry that Google unmasked her after a Manhattan judge forced the company to reveal her identity.

I wonder what the attorneys really discussed though. When the model’s attorney asked for the information, how long did it take them to respond? Did they sit and chat about softball games, little league, or Monday night bowling? Maybe they sat down to compare term life insurance rates just to pass the time and pad the books?

Seriously, doesn’t it just seem too convenient that Google turned over the name of the blogger so willingly?

Comments are closed.